Seminar

Опубликовано: 14 апреля 2017 г.
On wedn­esday, April 19, 2017 in the conf­ere­nce hall of IAP RAS will be held the seminar:
Georgiy Sten­chi­kov
King Abdu­llah Univ­ers­ity of Science and Tech­nol­ogy, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
«Impact of the 1991 Pina­tubo erup­tion on the regi­onal climate of Middle East »
Abst­ract
The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) regi­onal climate appears to be extr­emely sens­itive to volc­anic erup­tions. Winter cooling after the 1991 Pina­tubo erup­tion far exce­eded the mean hemi­sphe­ric temp­erat­ure anomaly, even causing snow­fall in Israel. This could be part­ially attr­ibu­ted to the forced posi­tive phase of North Atla­ntic osci­llat­ion (NAO); however, many other proc­esses inte­rfere. To better unde­rst­and MENA climate vari­abil­ity and the inte­rplay among regi­onal mech­ani­sms, the climate resp­onses to the El Chichón and Pina­tubo volc­anic erup­tions are calc­ula­ted using weather obse­rvat­ions, NOAA/NCEP Climate Fore­cast System Rean­aly­sis, and output from the Geop­hysi­cal Fluid Dyna­mics Labo­rat­ory’s High Reso­lut­ion Atmo­sphe­ric Model (HiRAM). The mult­iple regr­ess­ion anal­ysis both for the obse­rvat­ions and the model output is perf­ormed on seas­onal summer and winter comp­osi­tes to sepa­rate out the cont­ribu­tions from climate trends, El Niño Sout­hern Osci­llat­ion (ENSO), NAO, Indian summer monsoon and volc­anic aero­sols. Strong regi­onal temp­erat­ure and prec­ipit­ation resp­onses over the MENA region are found in both winter and summer. The model and the obse­rvat­ions both show that a posi­tive NAO ampl­ifies the MENA volc­anic winter cooling, making it two to three times stro­nger than the global mean resp­onse to volc­anic impact. In boreal summer, the patt­erns of chan­ging temp­erat­ure and prec­ipit­ation suggest a weak­ening and sout­hward shift of the Inte­rtro­pical Conv­erge­nce Zone, caused by volc­anic surface cooling and weak­ening of the Indian and West African mons­oons. The model capt­ures the main feat­ures of the climate resp­onse; however, it unde­rest­ima­tes the total cooling, espe­cia­lly in winter, and exhi­bits slig­htly diff­erent spatial patt­erns of the NAO climate resp­onse comp­ared to the obse­rvat­ions. The cond­ucted anal­ysis sheds light on the inte­rnal mech­ani­sms of MENA climate vari­abil­ity and helps to sele­ctiv­ely diag­nose the model defi­cien­cies.